Posts / australian-politics
The Diversity Poll, the Vegemite Jar, and the Argument We Keep Not Having
The Lowy Institute poll dropped this week and the headline made me put my coffee down for a second: the largest ever recorded decline in support for cultural diversity in Australia. Pauline Hanson is out there talking about a “monoculture” again, like it’s 1996 and nothing has changed except the resolution of the TV. Meanwhile Canberra gets held up as some kind of multicultural beacon, which, no offence to Canberra, is not a sentence I expected to type this decade.
I sat with this one longer than usual, because my first instinct was the tired old one: here we go again, another moral panic about people who look or pray differently. But the comments under the article told a slightly more interesting story than the headline did, and it’s worth sitting in that mess for a bit rather than picking a side and yelling about it.
A lot of the discussion wasn’t really about diversity at all. It was about money. Someone made the point that wages went sideways for years while corporate profits went vertical, and that the anger people feel about “too many migrants” is often anger about wages and housing wearing a different costume. Another person offered a genuinely useful distinction: offshoring a job to Manila and hiring a visa worker in Dandenong are not the same thing, but a business can absolutely do both in the same year to the same bottom line, and from the floor of a warehouse it all just looks like “my job got cheaper and it wasn’t my choice.” That’s not racism, that’s a pretty rational reaction to feeling replaceable. It just gets weaponised by people who’d rather you blame the bloke next to you on the train than the company issuing dividends.
Then there was the other camp, and I want to give this one a fair hearing too, because I think dismissing it outright is how we got here in the first place: a housing market this broken, with net overseas migration this high, and pretending there’s zero relationship between the two isn’t nuance, it’s denial. I don’t think that view is automatically racist. I think it’s economically real, and I think a lot of people on the left flinch away from saying it out loud because they’re worried about who else is standing next to them when they say it. That flinch has a cost. It hands the entire conversation to Hanson, who does not care about nuance, evidence, or your feelings about being called a bigot. She just wants the microphone, and every time reasonable people go quiet, she gets it.
I live in Melbourne’s outer southeast, and my daughter’s high school has kids whose families come from about fifteen different countries, all queueing up at the same Vietnamese bakery on a Saturday morning without a hint of civilisational collapse. That’s not a rebuttal to anyone’s economic anxiety, it’s just what the actual texture of daily life here looks like, and it doesn’t match the “monoculture” pitch even a little bit. But I also know two blokes from my old workplace whose entire department got restructured out from under them and replaced by a combination of an offshore team and a couple of visa hires on award wages nobody local would take. Both things are true at once. I’m not going to pretend that tension resolves itself just because it’s uncomfortable.
What actually worries me about the poll isn’t that Australians are becoming secretly racist overnight. It’s that a legitimate economic grievance, stagnant wages, a housing market that’s basically a casino with better landscaping, is being left unaddressed by the people who could fix it, and into that vacuum walks someone selling a simpler, uglier story. If Labor and the corporate sector actually wanted social cohesion, the fastest way there isn’t a messaging campaign about the virtues of multiculturalism. It’s wage growth, housing supply, and a government willing to say “corporate profits, not the guy on a 482 visa, are why your rent doubled.” Nobody in power seems especially keen to say that loudly, because it’s a harder fight than blaming migration and a lot less popular with donors.
I don’t have a tidy ending for this one. I think Australia is still, on balance, a genuinely decent place to be from somewhere else, and I’d like to believe that holds. I also think if we keep letting economic anxiety curdle into cultural resentment because nobody’s willing to have the harder conversation about wages and housing, the next Lowy poll is going to look worse, not better. Worth talking about over a coffee with someone who disagrees with you, honestly, rather than just scrolling past the headline and getting angry at strangers on the internet.